180 Telangana High Court judgments explained in plain English: what was decided, the law applied and why it matters. Page 6 of 8.
Telangana High Court holds that state must afford stakeholders meaningful consultation before finalizing outdoor advertising policy, upholding procedural fairness under Article 21.
Telangana High Court holds that pending criminal proceedings do not invalidate passport validity; renewal must be permitted unless specific risk to justice exists.
Telangana High Court directs Intermediate Board to issue hall tickets to students despite non-registration, upholding right to education under Articles 14 and 21.
Telangana High Court directs registration authorities to accept sale deeds where Waqf notifications have been set aside, affirming that revenue records prevail over invalid gazette notifications.
Telangana High Court directs authorities to justify compensation of 600 sq.yards/acre against promised 1000 sq.yards/acre under HMDA memo, upholding Article 300A rights.
High Court of Telangana holds that Section 35(3) BNSS mandates prior notice before arrest in offences punishable under 7 years, aligning with Arnesh Kumar guidelines to prevent arbitrary detention.
Telangana High Court directs timely disposal of regularization applications for unregistered sale deeds, affirming that inordinate delay violates property rights under Article 300A.
High Court of Telangana holds that failure to consider NOC deletion requests under Section 22A of the Registration Act violates natural justice and mandates reasoned orders within 60 days.
The Telangana High Court holds that Section 179 BNSS permits notices only to witnesses, not accused persons. Investigating officers must follow Section 35(3) procedures for summoning accused.
Telangana High Court holds that unexplained delay in deciding revision petitions and representations under OTS Scheme violates principles of natural justice, mandating timely adjudication.
High Court of Telangana holds that delay in refunding stamp duty violates Article 14 and natural justice; mandates timely processing under Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
The High Court of Telangana holds that undue delay in processing F-line applications for land survey and demarcation violates constitutional rights, mandating timely action under established guidelines.
High Court of Telangana holds that interim custody of a vehicle under BNSS Section 503 cannot be denied merely because the charge sheet is not filed. Key precedent for vehicle owners in NDPS cases.
The High Court of Telangana suspends suo moto revision proceedings after 20-year delay, affirming that undue delay vitiates administrative action under the Telangana Assigned Lands Act.
High Court of Telangana holds that registering officers must record written reasons for refusing to register a document under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.
High Court of Telangana quashes criminal proceedings against a student for driving without a number plate, holding it does not attract Section 318(4) BNS or criminal liability.
High Court of Telangana directs prompt release of retirement benefits upon administrative authorization, holding delay violative of Article 21 and mandates interest for undue delay.
The High Court of Telangana directs disposal of pending final reports within four months, affirming that undue delay in criminal proceedings violates Article 21 and the right to speedy justice.
Telangana High Court modifies compensation deposit condition under Section 148 NI Act, reducing it from 20% to 10%, emphasizing proportionality and Supreme Court precedent.
High Court of Telangana grants interim suspension of ROR mutation orders where Special Tribunal erroneously dismissed appeal based on non-existent pending civil suit.
High Court of Telangana holds that no authority can interfere with peaceful possession of property without due process of law, reinforcing constitutional safeguards under Article 226.
High Court of Telangana directs revenue authorities to decide pending online application for land extent correction in pattadar passbook, holding inaction as arbitrary under Article 14.
High Court of Telangana holds that seizure of vehicle without following statutory procedure violates Article 21; mandates deposit before court and prompt adjudication under BNSS.
Telangana High Court quashes criminal proceedings for failure to establish ingredients of Sections 171-B, 171-E, and 188 IPC, emphasizing necessity of direct evidence of gratification to voters.