488 Rajasthan High Court judgments explained in plain English: what was decided, the law applied and why it matters. Page 17 of 21.
Rajasthan High Court holds that contraband weight for commercial quantity under NDPS Act must be determined in dry state, not wet, impacting bail eligibility and prosecution thresholds.
The Jodhpur High Court mandates that from 15 April 2026, all vehicle fitness certificates in Rajasthan must be issued only through Automated Testing Stations, ending manual issuance.
Rajasthan High Court holds that private finance companies are not 'State' under Article 226; loan recovery actions cannot be challenged via writ petition.
Rajasthan High Court holds that public employees cannot be denied salary solely due to criminal arrest if continuously discharging duties post-bail.
Rajasthan High Court holds that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable against private societies for service disputes lacking public law elements.
Rajasthan High Court holds that suspending a government employee without issuing a charge sheet or pending inquiry violates natural justice and procedural fairness under Article 14.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail where NDPS contraband weight is marginally above commercial threshold and includes packaging, emphasizing proportionality in bail jurisprudence.
Rajasthan High Court holds Nagaur Central Cooperative Bank liable for crop insurance claims denied due to its clerical errors on the National Crop Insurance Portal under PMFBY.
The Rajasthan High Court holds that voluntary demolition of illegal construction does not absolve violators of costs; deterrence remains essential under building bye-laws.
Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR in matrimonial case after compromise, reaffirming that offences with civil flavour may be quashed to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Rajasthan High Court permits provisional participation in sports quota recruitment while preserving post vacancy, clarifying equitable relief in public employment disputes.
Rajasthan High Court quashes tender for Nakki Lake boat services due to non-compliance with Rule 68 of RTPP Rules 2013, affirming judicial review in public procurement.
Rajasthan High Court holds that a minor's voluntary expression to live with parents negates illegal detention claims, affirming child's autonomy in custody matters.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail after finding recovered substance was Mephedrone, not MDMA, and quantity below commercial limit under NDPS Act. Key precedent on bail in drug cases.
Rajasthan High Court mandates merit-based district allocation in public employment, prohibiting lower-ranked candidates from displacing meritorious ones.
Rajasthan High Court holds that banks must allow borrowers a chance to repay dues before taking possession under SARFAESI Act, reinforcing procedural fairness.
The Rajasthan High Court holds that administrative authorities must consider spousal hardship in government transfers, reinforcing natural justice under Article 14 and 21.
Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under Section 304(2) BNS after compromise, affirming that offences with civil flavour may be quashed despite gravity, per Gian Singh guidelines.
Rajasthan High Court holds that delay in filing written statement is excusable if plaintiff evidence has not begun, reinforcing procedural fairness under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.
The Rajasthan High Court holds that interim injunctions operating for over 13 years must be made absolute or vacated; trial courts must expedite final adjudication without bias.
Rajasthan High Court rules that employers cannot withhold salary without a specific, communicated order, even for medically unfit employees reassigned to lighter duties.
The Rajasthan High Court holds that renewing a health policy after rejecting a claim for pre-existing disease waives the exclusion, entitling beneficiaries to coverage under IRDA guidelines.
Rajasthan High Court rules banks cannot freeze accounts without opportunity of hearing or reasonable evidence, balancing investigative needs with account holder rights.
Rajasthan High Court holds that preventive measures under Sections 107 and 151 Cr.P.C. cannot override parole eligibility when jail conduct is good and no risk of reoffending exists.