Bombay High Court holds that confiscation of personal gold without Section 124 notice violates due process; authorities must restore value or equivalent gold.
Bombay High Court holds that state authorities must provide notice and hearing before mutating land records under rehabilitation laws, affirming natural justice in eminent domain cases.
Madras High Court rules that terminal benefits like leave encashment and provident fund are 'property' under Article 300-A, cannot be withheld without due process.
High Court of Telangana holds that no demolition can proceed without due process, citing Article 21 and prior orders. Key precedent for property rights and administrative action.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that banks cannot freeze accounts based solely on police directives without judicial authorization under Section 102 CrPC.
High Court of Telangana holds that authorities cannot demolish structures without due process, even if alleged to be non-compliant, affirming Article 21 rights and procedural fairness.
Telangana High Court holds that coercive removal of advertisements without hearing violates natural justice and Article 14; mandates opportunity of hearing before action.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that private property cannot be demolished for road widening without acquisition and compensation, reinforcing constitutional safeguards under Article 300A.
Rajasthan High Court mandates banks to freeze accounts only upon precise police direction and provides a 7-day window for confirmation, safeguarding business liquidity.
Rajasthan High Court holds banks cannot freeze accounts without precise evidence of cyber fraud; mandates procedural safeguards and time-bound police coordination.