The Central Information Commission holds that applicants cannot compel public authorities to provide copies of their own application forms under RTI Act, 2005, as such documents are not 'information' within Section 2(f).
CIC holds that advocates cannot file RTI applications on behalf of clients, reinforcing personal information exemption under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
CIC holds that RTI applications seeking justification for administrative decisions fall outside Section 2(f) definition of 'information', reinforcing that RTI cannot be used for grievance redressal.
The Central Information Commission holds that hypothetical questions about insurance policy interpretations are not 'information' under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Rajasthan High Court directs authorities to comply with land acquisition award granting 25% developed land within three weeks, emphasizing timely execution of compensation.
Bombay High Court holds that withholding examination results of students violates Article 21A and mandates immediate declaration of results to protect educational rights.
Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that criminal antecedents disqualify individuals from Samman Nidhi pension, even if detained for political reasons. Key principles on scheme eligibility clarified.
The Central Information Commission mandates resumption of proactive disclosure of Prasar Bharati Board minutes, reinforcing transparency under RTI Act 2005.
CIC holds that queries seeking justification for administrative decisions-such as why an advisory was issued or withdrawn-are not 'information' under Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that honorable acquittal in a criminal case cannot be grounds to reject a fresh arms license application, affirming presumption of innocence.
Madhya Pradesh High Court directs strict action against officials for manipulating revenue records, emphasizing duty to protect government land under Article 226.
Bombay High Court rules that appointments under reserved categories cannot be withheld pending tribe validity verification, while imposing costs for suppression of facts.
Bombay High Court holds that unauthorized constructions cannot be protected by delay, administrative inaction, or investment costs. Strict compliance with building regulations is non-negotiable.
Madras High Court directs revenue authorities to survey and demarcate land under Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 within 12 weeks, emphasizing statutory compliance.
Jharkhand High Court mandates accurate online entry of land records and issuance of Khatiyan and rent receipts, affirming that digital records must mirror official documents.