Topic
The LARR Act 2013 governs land acquisition in India, outlining procedures for compensation, objections, and lapse of proceedings when possession or payment is delayed.
Karnataka High Court quashes a land acquisition award for violating Section 26 of the LARR Act, 2013, by failing to conduct a hearing or assess land value based on proper evidence. The court remands the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing that compensation determination must comply with natural justice and statutory factors.
MP High Court at Gwalior reaffirms that land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the LARR Act automatically lapse if possession is not taken within five years. The court directed the Collector to decide the petitioners' representation within four weeks, protecting their possession rights over the disputed land.
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that using private land for road widening without initiating acquisition under the LARR Act 2013 violates Article 300-A and due process, mandating immediate compensation with 9% interest from the date of possession. This sets a critical precedent for state agencies using land for public infrastructure without following statutory acquisition procedures.
The Bombay High Court ruled that under Section 77 of the LARR Act, 2013, authorities cannot demand physical presence of landowners to disburse compensation if identity and supporting documents are duly verified. This clarifies administrative overreach and ensures timely payment to claimants who have fulfilled statutory requirements, particularly those unable to appear in person due to distance, disability, or other legitimate constraints.
Chhattisgarh High Court rules that the State's unauthorized use of private land for public purposes, even without formal acquisition, mandates compensation under the LARR Act 2013. The court directed payment of 9% and 15% interest on delayed compensation, reinforcing landowners' rights against procedural lapses by authorities.
Chhattisgarh High Court rules that disputes over apportionment of compensation under the LARR Act, 2013 must be adjudicated through Section 64 proceedings, not writ petitions. The decision reinforces the exclusivity of statutory remedies, ensuring claimants pursue the prescribed legal process to resolve compensation disputes while preserving their right to full compensation.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that the mere passage of time does not invalidate land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the LARR Act, 2013, provided compensation has been paid and physical possession transferred to the acquiring authority. This clarifies a critical ambiguity for state agencies and landowners alike, reinforcing that procedural compliance, not chronological delay, determines the validity of acquisition. The dismissal of all 15 writ petitions sets a binding precedent for similar cases across the state.
Bombay High Court holds Section 94 of LARR Act 2013 does not apply to acquisitions under National Highways Act, 1956; petitioners may claim compensation for adverse effects on business or easement.
Bombay High Court holds Section 94 of LARR Act 2013 does not apply to acquisitions under National Highways Act 1956; petitioners may claim compensation for adverse effects on business or easement.
Bombay High Court holds that residents suffering damage from blasting during highway construction are entitled to compensation, even if their land was not acquired under LARR Act 2013.
Andhra Pradesh High Court holds that landowners may object only to the three grounds under Section 15 of the LARR Act 2013; technical clearances are not mandatory for objection submission.