Bombay High Court holds that fee refunds after admission cut-off date require vacant seat filling; development fees must be refunded even if other fees are forfeited.
National Green Tribunal holds that environmental clearances issued without SEIAA approval violate EIA Notification 2006 and are void ab initio, reinforcing procedural safeguards under environmental law.
Bombay High Court holds that an unregistered agreement for sale with a condition precedent of state permission does not constitute a transfer under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
The High Court of Telangana holds that authorities must act on complaints regarding unauthorized hospitals under the Telangana Clinical Establishments Act, 2010, reinforcing statutory compliance.
Bombay High Court holds that land must be lawfully acquired before utilization for public projects; officers cannot shift burden to landowners.
Bombay High Court holds builders liable for delayed possession under RERA even if force majeure is claimed, reinforcing statutory timelines and consumer protection obligations.
Chhattisgarh High Court rules that maintenance under Section 125 CrPC cannot be granted if wife lives separately without sufficient cause, emphasizing statutory compliance.
Bombay High Court holds that Section 154(2A) of the MCS Act mandates a 50% pre-deposit before revision applications can be heard, rendering merits-based review illegal without compliance.
Andhra Pradesh High Court holds that construction without statutory permission under the Panchayat Raj Act is illegal and mandates immediate cessation until proper approval is obtained.
Kerala High Court holds that Parent-Teacher Associations cannot operate buses or occupy school premises without complying with Article 147 of KVS Education Code.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that insurance companies are not liable to indemnify if vehicle lacks valid fitness certificate, as mandated by Section 56 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Central Information Commission holds that failure to respond to RTI applications or first appeals constitutes violation of Section 7 and 19; CPIO and FAA must explain delay and comply with directions.