Tribunals and Commissions judgments

1766 Tribunals and Commissions judgments explained in plain English: what was decided, the law applied and why it matters. Page 4 of 74.

NIL Arm's Length Price for Intra-Group Services Held Illegal | Transfer Pricing Adjustment : ITAT Delhi Bench
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

NIL Arm's Length Price for Intra-Group Services Held Illegal | Transfer Pricing Adjustment : ITAT Delhi Bench

Delhi ITAT quashed a Rs 9.70 million transfer-pricing addition, holding that a zero arm’s-length price for intra-group management and support services breaches transfer-pricing rules. Taxpayers must demonstrate a tangible benefit to justify pricing. The ruling affects firms using NIL-price intra-group services under the Income Tax Act.

Concessional Basic Customs Duty (10%) Upheld for Mixed Polyester Warp-Knitted Fabrics | Revenue Failed to Prove Mis-classification : CESTAT
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Concessional Basic Customs Duty (10%) Upheld for Mixed Polyester Warp-Knitted Fabrics | Revenue Failed to Prove Mis-classification : CESTAT

CESTAT affirmed the importer’s classification of mixed polyester warp-knitted fabrics under tariff item 6005 9000 and upheld the 10 % concessional BCD, because the revenue could not produce technical evidence of mis-classification. The ruling shifts the evidential burden to customs authorities in similar classification disputes, benefiting textile importers.

Section 149(1)(a) bars reopening where §148 notice issued after 3 years and escaped income < Rs 50 Lakh - bogus political donation deduction denied | ITAT Jaipur
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 149(1)(a) bars reopening where §148 notice issued after 3 years and escaped income < Rs 50 Lakh - bogus political donation deduction denied | ITAT Jaipur

The tribunal held that a section 148 notice dated 12-April-2023 was time-barred under section 149(1)(a) because the income escaping assessment was below Rs 50 lakh, and therefore quashed the assessment disallowing the claimed deduction under 80GGC for a bogus political donation. The ruling underscores that reopening notices beyond three years are invalid when the escaped income does not exceed the Rs 50 lakh threshold.

Liquidation order set aside; Sec 12A withdrawal allowed despite missing 66% vote under Sec 33 | Corporate Insolvency - IBC : NCLAT
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Liquidation order set aside; Sec 12A withdrawal allowed despite missing 66% vote under Sec 33 | Corporate Insolvency - IBC : NCLAT

NCLAT quashed the liquidation order of Jeppiaar Cements, revived the corporate insolvency resolution process and permitted withdrawal of the Sec 12A application even though the Committee of Creditors failed to meet the 66 % voting threshold prescribed by Sec 33. The ruling affirms a resolution professional’s discretion to deem a Sec 12A withdrawal viable, protecting creditor interests and keeping restructuring options open for the debtor.

Section 153C satisfaction notes must be year-wise; notices issued beyond 15 months are time-barred | ITAT quashes assessment orders : ITAT Delhi
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 153C satisfaction notes must be year-wise; notices issued beyond 15 months are time-barred | ITAT quashes assessment orders : ITAT Delhi

The Delhi ITAT set aside assessment orders for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, ruling that a single omnibus satisfaction note under Sec 153C is invalid without year-wise linkage of seized material to income. It also declared that notices served after the statutory 15-month limitation are void. Taxpayers must ensure separate satisfaction notes for each year and timely notices.

Section 87A Rebate Available on Short-Term Capital Gains Taxed at Special Rates When Income ≤ Rs 7 Lakh | ITAT Jaipur Bench
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 87A Rebate Available on Short-Term Capital Gains Taxed at Special Rates When Income ≤ Rs 7 Lakh | ITAT Jaipur Bench

Taxpayers whose total income does not exceed Rs 7 lakh can claim the Section 87A rebate even on short-term capital gains that attract the special 15 % rate under Section 111A. The Jaipur ITAT reversed the CIT(A)’s refusal, confirming that the rebate applies to the computed tax liability irrespective of the special-rate provision. This benefits individual investors with modest incomes who realise short-term gains.

Section 153D Requires Prior Joint Commissioner Approval; Assessment Orders Issued Without It Are Void | Assessment Orders : ITAT Surat Bench
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 153D Requires Prior Joint Commissioner Approval; Assessment Orders Issued Without It Are Void | Assessment Orders : ITAT Surat Bench

The ITAT Surat Bench set aside assessment orders for AY 2011-14 because the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) failed to obtain the mandatory prior approval of the Joint Commissioner under Section 153D. The ruling makes it clear that any assessment under special provisions is invalid without such approval, impacting both taxpayers and revenue officials.

Compassionate appointment staff can shift to Old Pension Scheme despite post-2004 NPS entry if recruitment began before OPS; laches not a bar | Delhi Police OPS shift : CAT
|Central Administrative Tribunal

Compassionate appointment staff can shift to Old Pension Scheme despite post-2004 NPS entry if recruitment began before OPS; laches not a bar | Delhi Police OPS shift : CAT

The CAT ruled that Delhi Police constables appointed on compassionate grounds may be transferred from the New Pension Scheme to the Old Pension Scheme when the recruitment process started before the OPS cut-off date, even if they joined after 1 January 2004. The tribunal held that laches and lack of prior notice do not defeat the entitlement. This benefits all compassionate-appointment employees seeking OPS benefits.

15-day competing-offer window under Regulation 20(1) starts at Detailed Public Statement - exemption denied | Religare takeover : SAT (Mumbai)
Case Law Analysis
|Securities Appellate Tribunal

15-day competing-offer window under Regulation 20(1) starts at Detailed Public Statement - exemption denied | Religare takeover : SAT (Mumbai)

The Securities Appellate Tribunal ruled that the 15-day period for a rival bid under SEBI’s Regulation 20(1) is triggered by the acquirer’s Detailed Public Statement and cannot be shortened by any exemption. This strict timing applies to all takeover contests, affecting bidders and target companies alike.

Export incentives and cash discounts must be treated as operating revenue for TNMM analysis | Transfer Pricing (Sec 92C) : ITAT
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Export incentives and cash discounts must be treated as operating revenue for TNMM analysis | Transfer Pricing (Sec 92C) : ITAT

The Delhi ITAT ruled that export incentives and cash discounts form part of a taxpayer’s operating revenue for the purpose of the Transactional Net Margin Method, requiring comparables to be selected on a fully adjusted basis. This clarifies the treatment of such items in transfer-pricing documentation and impacts exporters relying on TNMM benchmarks. Assessors must now ensure FAR-based comparables reflect these revenue components.

Limitation for Section 153C assessment runs from satisfaction-note date, not from Section 127 order | Multi-entity search cases : ITAT
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Limitation for Section 153C assessment runs from satisfaction-note date, not from Section 127 order | Multi-entity search cases : ITAT

ITAT held that the limitation clock for a Section 153C assessment begins on the date the assessing officer records the satisfaction note, not on the earlier Section 127 order. This narrows the time-bar for revenue to finalize assessments in multi-entity search cases, affecting taxpayers facing delayed notices.

Disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions under Sec 143(1)(a) invalid for AY 2019-20 | Tax assessment adjustment : ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions under Sec 143(1)(a) invalid for AY 2019-20 | Tax assessment adjustment : ITAT Bangalore

The ITAT Bangalore ruled that a disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions under section 143(1)(a) for AY 2019-20 is invalid, ordering deletion of the addition. Employers cannot be penalised for late employee-share contributions for that year, aligning with the Supreme Court’s Checkmate Services precedent.

Interest on deposits qualifies as deductible business income for credit co-operatives under Sec 80P(2)(a)(i) | Income Tax deduction for co-ops : ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Interest on deposits qualifies as deductible business income for credit co-operatives under Sec 80P(2)(a)(i) | Income Tax deduction for co-ops : ITAT Bangalore

The ITAT Bangalore ruled that interest earned on deposits by a credit cooperative is an allowable deduction under Sec 80P(2)(a)(i), interpreting ‘attributable’ to mean income arising from the society’s credit activities. This clarifies that such interest can be claimed as business income, benefiting credit co-operatives seeking tax relief on deposit earnings.

Interest @12% on Refund for Service Tax Paid Under Mistake of Fact | Service Tax Refund : CESTAT
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Interest @12% on Refund for Service Tax Paid Under Mistake of Fact | Service Tax Refund : CESTAT

CESTAT ruled that a refund of service tax paid under a mistake of fact attracts interest at 12% per annum, superseding the earlier 6% rate. This higher rate applies to any taxpayer seeking restitution for erroneous service tax payments, enhancing compensation for delayed refunds. The decision sets a binding precedent for future service tax refund claims.