The Rajasthan High Court holds that gallantry promotion under Rule 28(a) is discretionary, not a vested right, and delay bars writ relief under Article 226.
Madras High Court directs provisional release of detained imported goods under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962, despite missing BIS/DGFT certifications, setting precedent for similar cases.
Madras High Court directs authorities to consider prisoner transfer request on humanitarian grounds within four weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness under Article 226.
Bombay High Court holds that Competent Authority under MOFA cannot adjudicate FSI or development rights disputes; petitioner must pursue civil suit. Key precedent reaffirmed.
Bombay High Court clarifies that Competent Authority under MOFA cannot adjudicate FSI/TDR disputes; petitioners must pursue civil remedies for development rights.
Bombay High Court clarifies that writ petitions under Article 226 cannot be entertained to adjudicate service disputes when statutory remedies are available, reinforcing procedural discipline.
Bombay High Court holds that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked against private sugar cooperatives absent exercise of public function or state-like authority.