#Public Utility

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that electricity distribution companies cannot delay or withhold new connections due to disputed documents - they must decide within 30 days of receiving a complete application. This enforces access to electricity as a fundamental right under Article 21, directly impacting millions of rural and informal sector users awaiting basic utility services.

Karnataka High Court rules that obstructing the sole access to private property via a transmission tower violates the 'least damage principle' under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act. Authorities must provide concrete, enforceable access solutions, not mere assurances, ensuring property rights are preserved without rendering the property inaccessible.

The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that cutting off electricity to vulnerable residents over a private property dispute constitutes a violation of the right to life under Article 21. It ordered immediate temporary power restoration without demanding ownership documents, setting a precedent that basic utilities cannot be weaponized in civil or familial conflicts.

ITAT Delhi holds that charitable trusts with mixed objectives including religious activities retain 80G eligibility if such activities are not wholly or substantially religious in nature.

Kerala High Court holds that electricity poles used for fibre-optic cable networks fall under 'street furniture' under the Telecommunications (Right of Way) Rules, 2024, capping recurring charges at Rs.100 per pole per annum.

Supreme Court rules that in public utility projects, proof of actual loss is not required for awarding liquidated damages under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act.