CAT Jammu holds that uninterrupted service on a sanctioned post creates enforceable rights under Articles 14 and 16, directing regularization from date of officiation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that drastic shift in recruitment ratio from 90% promotion to 90% direct recruitment violates equality and reasonable classification under Article 14.
Bombay High Court holds that excise authorities cannot demand differential licence fees based on unpublished census data, affirming statutory clarity under Rule 24 of Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that authorities must decide rehabilitation claims before eviction; coercive action barred pending decision.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that altering age limits after advertisement issuance violates fair recruitment principles, upholding *K. Manjusree* precedent.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that state must decide employment claims under rehabilitation policy within stipulated time, ensuring non-discrimination and procedural fairness.
Telangana High Court holds that candidates selected before 2004 but appointed after implementation of NPS are entitled to Old Pension Scheme if delay was administrative.