Topic

Arbitrary State Action

8 articlesLatest July 2026
Writ of Mandamus | AP HC Directs State to Release MGNREGS Payments Within 8 Weeks : AP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Writ of Mandamus | AP HC Directs State to Release MGNREGS Payments Within 8 Weeks : AP HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court directed state authorities to release Rs. 30,16,338 to a contractor within eight weeks for MGNREGS works, emphasizing the state's obligation to honor contractual commitments and prevent arbitrary withholding of payments. The ruling underscores the enforceability of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 against state inaction in public contracts.

Section 5-A U.P. Cow Slaughter Act | Intrastate Transport Without Permit Cannot Justify Vehicle Confiscation: Allahabad HC Awards ₹6 Lakh Compensation
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Section 5-A U.P. Cow Slaughter Act | Intrastate Transport Without Permit Cannot Justify Vehicle Confiscation: Allahabad HC Awards ₹6 Lakh Compensation

Allahabad HC ruled that confiscation of a vehicle under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act for intrastate transport without a permit is arbitrary and violates fundamental rights. The court set aside the confiscation order and directed ₹4 lakh compensation plus ₹2 lakh damages for unlawful auction and livelihood loss, reinforcing safeguards against arbitrary state action.

Rule 58 U.P. Minor Minerals Rules | State’s Delay in Lease Termination Violates Article 14; Royalty Liability Ceases Post-Mining Stoppage : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Rule 58 U.P. Minor Minerals Rules | State’s Delay in Lease Termination Violates Article 14; Royalty Liability Ceases Post-Mining Stoppage : Allahabad HC

Allahabad HC rules that the State’s unjustified delay in terminating a mining lease under Rule 58 of the U.P. Minor Minerals Rules, 1963, renders its action arbitrary and violates Article 14. The court held that royalty liability ceases once mining operations stop, and directed adjustment of ₹70 lakh deposits against earlier installments, setting a precedent for prompt State action in lease terminations.

Article 226 | Admitted MGNREGS Dues Entitle Contractor to Mandamus Despite Alternate Remedies: Andhra Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Article 226 | Admitted MGNREGS Dues Entitle Contractor to Mandamus Despite Alternate Remedies: Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that non-payment of admitted dues under MGNREGS constitutes arbitrary state action, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 even when statutory remedies exist. The judgment reinforces contractors' rights to seek judicial intervention for unpaid government dues, setting a precedent for similar disputes.