Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that delay in filing additional documentary evidence does not justify rejection if evidence is relevant and essential for a just trial under Section 311 CrPC.
Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds trial court's discretion under Section 311 CrPC to summon bank witness post-closure of evidence, affirming truth-seeking over procedural rigidity.
Madras High Court holds that delay in cross-examination does not forfeit the right to examine a witness under Section 311 CrPC; conditional opportunity must be granted.
Rajasthan High Court holds that denial of cross-examination violates natural justice; mandates one final opportunity under Section 311 CrPC with cost condition.