Topic

fundamental right

6 articlesLatest June 2026
Article 21 | Lawful Occupant Entitled to Electricity Connection Without Title Deed: Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Article 21 | Lawful Occupant Entitled to Electricity Connection Without Title Deed: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that access to electricity is a fundamental right under Article 21, and authorities cannot deny connection to a lawful occupant solely due to lack of title deed. This sets a critical precedent for vulnerable residents-especially women and displaced persons-in securing basic utilities regardless of property ownership disputes.

RTE Act | Unregistered Leave & License Agreement Suffices as Residence Proof for SC/ST Admission : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

RTE Act | Unregistered Leave & License Agreement Suffices as Residence Proof for SC/ST Admission : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that a registered leave-and-license agreement is not mandatory to prove residence under the Right to Education Act; an unregistered agreement, coupled with long-term occupancy and supporting documents, satisfies the 1-km radius requirement for Scheduled Caste admissions. This clarifies a critical barrier for low-income families and reinforces substantive rights over procedural formalities in access to education.

Article 21 | Pendency of Rule 14 Proceedings Cannot Deny Ex-India Leave for Personal Travel: CAT Ernakulam
Case Law Analysis
|Central Administrative Tribunal

Article 21 | Pendency of Rule 14 Proceedings Cannot Deny Ex-India Leave for Personal Travel: CAT Ernakulam

CAT Ernakulam rules that the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 cannot be restricted merely due to pending disciplinary proceedings under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules. The tribunal relied on the Supreme Court’s precedent in Satish Chandra Verma to affirm that personal travel leave cannot be denied without a substantive finding of guilt, impacting government employees facing similar procedural hurdles.

Article 21 | Denial of Electricity Due to Private Property Dispute Violates Right to Life; Temporary Connection Mandated Without Ownership Proof : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Article 21 | Denial of Electricity Due to Private Property Dispute Violates Right to Life; Temporary Connection Mandated Without Ownership Proof : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that cutting off electricity to vulnerable residents over a private property dispute constitutes a violation of the right to life under Article 21. It ordered immediate temporary power restoration without demanding ownership documents, setting a precedent that basic utilities cannot be weaponized in civil or familial conflicts.