Madhya Pradesh High Court mandates strict timelines for Collectors to enforce possession under SARFAESI Act, reinforcing procedural compliance and judicial oversight.
Himachal Pradesh High Court holds that co-accused confessions and call records without corroboration are insufficient to deny bail under NDPS Act Section 37.
Madhya Pradesh High Court condones seven-year delay in filing criminal appeal, emphasizing no prejudice to state and remanding for merits-based hearing under Section 12 of Probation of Offenders Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that RERA-ordered interest must be judicially determined before recovery proceedings under Land Revenue Code can proceed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that banks cannot freeze accounts based solely on cyber police directives without judicial authorization under BNSS Section 102.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that subsequent FIR alone cannot justify cancellation of anticipatory bail; very cogent supervening circumstances required under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that altering age limits after advertisement issuance violates fair recruitment principles, upholding *K. Manjusree* precedent.
Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's power to apply 'pay and recover' even after amendments to Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that discriminatory denial of regularisation to similarly placed employees constitutes a continuing wrong with recurring cause of action under service law.
Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes criminal proceedings under Sections 145-146 CrPC where civil litigation over the same property is pending, reaffirming the principle that criminal law must not encroach on civil disputes.
Madhya Pradesh High Court clarifies that Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act applies only if termination occurs after dispute initiation, not if decision predates it.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that denial of supurdgi to a juvenile must be grounded in social investigation reports, not merely the gravity of the alleged offence.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to adjudicate disputed facts or award compensation in medical negligence cases.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that res judicata does not apply when different parties file applications with distinct scopes in execution proceedings under CPC Order 26 Rule 9.
Madhya Pradesh High Court stays frequent postings of Patwari, holding that disruptive transfers impair field efficiency and violate service stability under constitutional principles.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that delay in filing Section 34 application cannot be penalized when absence is due to counsel's default and party had no notice of dismissal.
Himachal Pradesh High Court grants bail, holding that Section 111 BNS requires two prior charge sheets within ten years; criminal antecedents alone cannot deny bail without prima facie heinousness.
Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds trial court's discretion under Section 311 CrPC to summon bank witness post-closure of evidence, affirming truth-seeking over procedural rigidity.
Madhya Pradesh High Court clarifies that revision against interim maintenance orders is restricted to jurisdictional errors, not factual reappreciation. Key precedent from Malkeet Singh Gill reaffirmed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that delay in filing FIR does not invalidate motor accident claims if evidence is properly appreciated and delay is reasonably explained.