Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that departmental proceedings must cease upon criminal acquittal when facts and evidence are identical, upholding natural justice and fairness.
Central Administrative Tribunal rules that mere pendency of FIRs without conviction cannot disqualify government employees from promotions or appointments under Articles 14 and 21.
Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) dismisses review petition, holding that review jurisdiction cannot re-litigate merits where vacancies are filled and no actionable relief remains.
The Jodhpur High Court holds that temporary medical officers must be prioritized for unfilled posts before initiating new recruitment, establishing a duty of fair consideration.
The Central Administrative Tribunal holds that a waiting list cannot be revived after a selected candidate joins and later resigns, affirming finality in recruitment processes.
Kerala High Court holds that terminal benefits and pension income alone cannot disqualify a family from compassionate appointment if genuine indigence exists.
Gauhati High Court holds that termination of Grade-IV employees after 14 years of service for procedural lapses, without fraud, violates natural justice and Article 14. Reinstatement ordered.
Madras High Court holds that retrospective application of service rule amendments denying promotion to surveyors violates accrued rights and established legal principles.
Rajasthan High Court holds that temporary medical officers have no vested right to continuation after regular appointments, but must be considered sympathetically for vacant posts based on merit and experience.
Jharkhand High Court directs filling of 2034 unfilled vacancies on merit and mandates independent fact-finding commission to address irregularities in recruitment.
High Court of Telangana mandates payment of retirement benefits within six weeks with 10% interest for delay, affirming statutory duty and constitutional obligation.
Jharkhand High Court mandates a one-man fact-finding commission to investigate recruitment irregularities, affirming constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 16.
Chhattisgarh High Court directs authorities to consider regularization of daily wage workers with over 10 years of service, citing Supreme Court precedents on fair employment practices.
Jharkhand High Court directs filling of 2034 unfilled vacancies on merit and mandates a one-man fact-finding commission to address systemic irregularities in recruitment.
Rajasthan High Court holds that candidates delayed due to state fault are entitled to seniority and consequential benefits equal to those appointed lower in merit.