Topic

MCGM

3 articlesLatest May 2026
Regulation 33(7) DCPR-2034 | First Valid Redevelopment Proposal with 51% Tenant Consents Blocks Parallel Applications : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Regulation 33(7) DCPR-2034 | First Valid Redevelopment Proposal with 51% Tenant Consents Blocks Parallel Applications : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that under DCPR-2034, only the first redevelopment proposal securing statutorily verified 51% tenant consents can proceed, invalidating subsequent competing applications. The judgment reinforces the 'first-past-the-post' principle in cooperative housing redevelopment, prioritizing procedural finality over parallel claims.

Slum Redevelopment Eligibility | Bombay HC Rules Annexure-II Survey Records Are Conclusive; Self-Declared Occupation Insufficient : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Slum Redevelopment Eligibility | Bombay HC Rules Annexure-II Survey Records Are Conclusive; Self-Declared Occupation Insufficient : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court upholds that eligibility for slum redevelopment benefits under the Slum Act is strictly determined by official survey records (Annexure-II). Long-term occupation or self-declared room splits without documentary proof cannot override survey findings, reinforcing the primacy of statutory verification for shelter rights.