Topic

Designs Act 2000

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Section 22(4) Designs Act | Defence Challenging Design Validity Triggers Mandatory High Court Transfer : Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Section 22(4) Designs Act | Defence Challenging Design Validity Triggers Mandatory High Court Transfer : Kerala HC

Kerala High Court rules that raising a defence under Section 22(4) of the Designs Act, 2000-challenging the validity of a registered design-automatically transfers the case to the High Court, bypassing lower court jurisdiction. This holding reinforces the exclusive jurisdiction of High Courts in design validity disputes, impacting litigants and practitioners in IP enforcement.

Section 19 Designs Act 2000 | Prior Publication Must Be Proven by Documentary Evidence, Not Ocular Impression: Calcutta HC Remands for Fresh Adjudication
Case Law Analysis
|Intellectual Property Appellate Board

Section 19 Designs Act 2000 | Prior Publication Must Be Proven by Documentary Evidence, Not Ocular Impression: Calcutta HC Remands for Fresh Adjudication

Calcutta High Court sets aside a design registration order, ruling that novelty and prior publication under the Designs Act 2000 must be established through strict documentary proof and comparative analysis, not mere visual inspection. The case is remanded for re-adjudication, emphasizing the need for rigorous evidentiary standards in design cancellation proceedings.

GUIs Qualify as Registrable Designs Under Section 2(d) of Designs Act 2000 If Visually Perceivable and Not Merely Functional : Calcutta HC
Case Law Analysis
|Calcutta High Court

GUIs Qualify as Registrable Designs Under Section 2(d) of Designs Act 2000 If Visually Perceivable and Not Merely Functional : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has held that Graphical User Interfaces can be registered as designs under the Designs Act, 2000 if their visual features are applied to an article by an industrial process and judged solely by the eye, rejecting the misconception that GUIs are inherently functional or transient. This landmark ruling opens the door for tech and consumer electronics firms to protect innovative interface designs, aligning Indian IP law with global standards for digital aesthetics.