Topic

Customs Exemption

5 articlesLatest June 2026
DFIA Scheme | Actual User Conditions Cannot Be Imposed via DGFT Public Notice; Only Statutory Notification Can Alter FTP Terms : CESTAT Kolkata
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

DFIA Scheme | Actual User Conditions Cannot Be Imposed via DGFT Public Notice; Only Statutory Notification Can Alter FTP Terms : CESTAT Kolkata

CESTAT Kolkata invalidates DGFT's use of public notices to impose actual user conditions on Transferable Duty-Free Import Authorizations, affirming that only notifications issued in the Official Gazette have legal force to amend Foreign Trade Policy terms. This ruling protects importers and transferees from retroactive administrative overreach and reinforces the hierarchy of delegated legislation under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act.

Customs Exemption Notification No. 65/88-Cus. | Hospital Duty Waiver Voided for Failing Free Treatment Obligations : CESTAT Hyderabad
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Customs Exemption Notification No. 65/88-Cus. | Hospital Duty Waiver Voided for Failing Free Treatment Obligations : CESTAT Hyderabad

CESTAT Hyderabad denied customs duty exemption to Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital for failing to fulfill mandatory conditions: providing free treatment to 40% of outpatients and reserving 10% of beds for low-income patients. The ruling reinforces that exemption benefits are strictly conditional, and non-compliance triggers retrospective duty demand and confiscation - a critical warning for charitable hospitals relying on duty waivers.

Customs Exemption | Procedural Non-Compliance Does Not Void Benefit If Substantive Purpose Is Met : CESTAT
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Customs Exemption | Procedural Non-Compliance Does Not Void Benefit If Substantive Purpose Is Met : CESTAT

CESTAT rules that failure to meet a procedural condition under a customs exemption notification does not automatically trigger duty demand, provided the underlying objective of the condition has been achieved. This shields compliant importers from punitive demands when technical lapses don't undermine the exemption's intent, reinforcing proportionality in customs enforcement.

Certificate of Origin | Importers Cannot Be Penalized for Relying on Valid Foreign-Issued COOs; Verification Burden Lies with Customs : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Certificate of Origin | Importers Cannot Be Penalized for Relying on Valid Foreign-Issued COOs; Verification Burden Lies with Customs : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that importers acting in good faith on government-issued Certificates of Origin cannot be held liable for discrepancies in value addition claims. The Department must conduct its own statutory verification under the Interim Rules of Origin before denying preferential duty benefits, protecting importers from retrospective penalties based on unverified foreign data.

SAD Exemption Under Notification 45/2005 | Stock Transfer from FTWZ to DTA Eligible Despite VAT Payable : CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

SAD Exemption Under Notification 45/2005 | Stock Transfer from FTWZ to DTA Eligible Despite VAT Payable : CESTAT Mumbai

CESTAT Mumbai rules that Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption under Notification 45/2005 applies to stock transfers from Free Trade Warehousing Zones (FTWZ) to Domestic Tariff Areas (DTA) even if VAT is payable on final sale. The tribunal also bars invocation of the extended limitation period without legal basis, reinforcing compliance clarity for importers and manufacturers.