Topic

compensation dispute

6 articlesLatest July 2026
Land Acquisition Act | Abuse of Process Bars Appeal After 9-Year Delay and Undisclosed Lok Adalat Settlement : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Land Acquisition Act | Abuse of Process Bars Appeal After 9-Year Delay and Undisclosed Lok Adalat Settlement : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court sets a precedent by dismissing a landowner's appeal under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act after he accepted compensation, delayed filing for nine years, and failed to disclose a prior Lok Adalat settlement. The ruling reinforces that courts will not entertain appeals constituting abuse of process, protecting finality in land acquisition disputes.

Section 18 Land Acquisition Act | Limitation Period for Compensation Challenge Begins Only Upon Actual Award Communication : MP HC Jabalpur
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 18 Land Acquisition Act | Limitation Period for Compensation Challenge Begins Only Upon Actual Award Communication : MP HC Jabalpur

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that the limitation period under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for challenging compensation begins only when the award is actually communicated to the landowner, not from its issuance date. This holding ensures procedural fairness and prevents landowners from being barred from claims due to administrative delays in communication.

Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction Barred for Reopening Compensation Disputes After Consent Award & Registered Sale Deed : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction Barred for Reopening Compensation Disputes After Consent Award & Registered Sale Deed : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that once a consent award under land acquisition is executed via registered sale deed, writ petitions under Article 226 cannot reopen compensation claims. Disputes over coercion, land classification, or valuation must be adjudicated in civil courts with proper evidence recording, reinforcing contractual finality in land acquisition proceedings.

Section 3G(5) National Highways Act | Compensation Dispute Must Be Referred to Arbitrator Upon Written Request Even After Payment : Gauhati HC
Case Law Analysis
|Gauhati High Court

Section 3G(5) National Highways Act | Compensation Dispute Must Be Referred to Arbitrator Upon Written Request Even After Payment : Gauhati HC

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that once a landowner submits a written request for arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, the authorities are legally bound to refer the compensation dispute to an arbitrator - regardless of whether compensation has already been paid. This reinforces that the right to arbitrate is not waived by receipt of payment and ensures landowners retain statutory recourse to challenge valuation adequacy.