Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that drastic shift in recruitment ratio from 90% promotion to 90% direct recruitment violates equality and reasonable classification under Article 14.
Madhya Pradesh High Court strikes down territorial eligibility clause for NEET-PG admissions, holding it violates Article 14 and undermines national merit-based system.
The Jodhpur High Court holds that temporary medical officers must be prioritized for unfilled posts before initiating new recruitment, establishing a duty of fair consideration.
Telangana High Court upholds students' right to re-verification of answer sheets after marginal failure in MBBS exams, citing RTI Act and constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 21.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that provisional admissions in PG medical courses do not create vested rights; amendments to align with Tanvi Behl are valid and constitutionally sound.
Madhya Pradesh High Court strikes down state-specific MBBS graduation requirement for NEET-PG admissions, affirming national eligibility standards under Article 14 and 21.
Telangana High Court holds that unexplained administrative delay in approving religious jathara violates Article 14; mandamus issued to consider representation promptly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court holds that when the state admits contractual dues, withholding payment violates Articles 14 and 21; mandates payment within six weeks.
Jharkhand High Court directs filling of 2034 unfilled vacancies on merit and mandates a one-man fact-finding commission to address systemic irregularities in recruitment.
Rajasthan High Court holds that candidates delayed due to state fault are entitled to seniority and consequential benefits equal to those appointed lower in merit.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that discriminatory denial of regularisation to similarly placed employees constitutes a continuing wrong with recurring cause of action under service law.
Madhya Pradesh High Court stays frequent postings of Patwari, holding that disruptive transfers impair field efficiency and violate service stability under constitutional principles.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that OBC caste certificates issued by other states are valid for reservation in MP if the community is recognized in both states, reinforcing non-arbitrariness in public employment.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that ad hoc service must be counted for pension benefits when a precedent has already established the principle for similarly situated employees.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that state must decide employment claims under rehabilitation policy within stipulated time, ensuring non-discrimination and procedural fairness.