Topic

Administrative Duty

4 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 24(2) LARR Act | Land Acquisition Lapses If Possession Not Taken Within 5 Years: MP HC Gwalior Directs Collector to Adjudicate
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 24(2) LARR Act | Land Acquisition Lapses If Possession Not Taken Within 5 Years: MP HC Gwalior Directs Collector to Adjudicate

MP High Court at Gwalior reaffirms that land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the LARR Act automatically lapse if possession is not taken within five years. The court directed the Collector to decide the petitioners' representation within four weeks, protecting their possession rights over the disputed land.

SARFAESI Act | Possession Under Section 14 Does Not Automatically Entitle Khata Entry; Revenue Authorities Must Consider Representations Within 3 Months : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

SARFAESI Act | Possession Under Section 14 Does Not Automatically Entitle Khata Entry; Revenue Authorities Must Consider Representations Within 3 Months : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court clarifies that lenders taking possession under SARFAESI Act must still follow administrative due process for Khata issuance. Revenue authorities are mandated to consider representations within three months, reinforcing that possession does not equate to ownership in revenue records. The ruling underscores the distinction between secured creditor rights and revenue record updates, impacting financial institutions and borrowers alike.

Section 14 SARFAESI Act | Physical Possession Mandatory Within 30 Days of Judicial Order : MP HC Sets Compliance Deadline
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 14 SARFAESI Act | Physical Possession Mandatory Within 30 Days of Judicial Order : MP HC Sets Compliance Deadline

MP High Court rules that mere issuance of a Section 14 order under SARFAESI Act does not fulfill statutory compliance-banks must ensure physical possession of secured assets within 30 days. Non-compliance empowers borrowers to challenge enforcement actions, reinforcing lenders' administrative duty beyond judicial directives.

Disability Accommodation Under Service Law | Madras HC Directs Consideration of Transfer Request for 91% Hearing-Impaired Employee
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court

Disability Accommodation Under Service Law | Madras HC Directs Consideration of Transfer Request for 91% Hearing-Impaired Employee

Madras High Court rules that administrative inaction on disability-based transfer requests violates constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 21, directing Annamalai University to consider the representation of a hearing-impaired employee within three weeks. The judgment reinforces the duty of public employers to provide reasonable accommodation under disability policies.