Topic

Welfare Scheme

Welfare schemes in India refer to government programs designed to provide financial aid, insurance, or support to vulnerable groups such as farmers, construction workers, and families of deceased breadwinners.

7 articlesLatest July 2026
Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna | Active Farming Qualifies for Benefits Regardless of Breadwinner Status : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna | Active Farming Qualifies for Benefits Regardless of Breadwinner Status : Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a farmer’s eligibility under the state’s accident welfare scheme is determined by active agricultural labor, not household income role. This sets a critical precedent for thousands of small and marginal farmers whose labor sustains family farms but who are often excluded by bureaucratic interpretations of 'breadwinner'.

Retrospective Limitation Periods Invalid for Beneficial Schemes Without Express Provision | Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Payment Under Deen Dayal Yojna
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Retrospective Limitation Periods Invalid for Beneficial Schemes Without Express Provision | Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Payment Under Deen Dayal Yojna

The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that a 90-day limitation period introduced after a beneficiary’s right accrued under the Deen Dayal Yojna cannot be applied retrospectively. The Court emphasized that beneficial legislation must be interpreted liberally, directing payment within two months as the amendment lacked explicit retrospective effect.

Mukhya Mantri Kishan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojana | Administrative Delay Cannot Defeat Welfare Claim Under Limitation : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Mukhya Mantri Kishan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojana | Administrative Delay Cannot Defeat Welfare Claim Under Limitation : Allahabad HC

Allahabad HC ruled that beneficiaries of welfare schemes cannot be penalized for administrative delays caused by state officials. The court quashed the rejection of a farmer’s widow’s insurance claim, holding that limitation periods must not override the scheme’s protective intent, especially when procedural lapses are attributable to the state.