#settlement deed registration

Madras HC rules that refusal to register a settlement deed based on an unprobated, unregistered will violates natural justice and is legally unsustainable in non-metropolitan areas. The court emphasized that probate is not a prerequisite for will validity outside metro jurisdictions, reinforcing procedural fairness in property registration disputes.

Madras High Court quashes a sub-registrar's refusal to register a settlement deed without providing a reasoned order or hearing the parties, reinforcing that administrative authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes under the Registration Act. The ruling mandates compliance with natural justice principles, ensuring fair procedure in deed registration.

Madras High Court rules that an unregistered will is sufficient to establish title for settlement deed registration, provided patta and heirship certificates are produced. The judgment clarifies that the Registration Act does not mandate will registration, protecting property owners from arbitrary refusals by sub-registrars.

Madras High Court rules that Sub-Registrars must afford a hearing to both the settlor and third-party protestor before refusing registration of a settlement deed. The court emphasized that administrative orders must be reasoned and comply with principles of natural justice, impacting property registration disputes involving third-party objections.

Madras High Court holds that Section 22A(2) of the Registration Act does not bar registration of settlement deeds for inherited properties with approved construction, clarifying scope of 'layout' under Tamil Nadu rules.