Topic
The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer’s ad-hoc valuation method violated Section 92C and set aside the Rs 357.35 crore adjustment. The ruling reinforces that only the prescribed five methods may be used, affecting taxpayers facing TP adjustments.
Delhi ITAT quashed a Rs 9.70 million transfer-pricing addition, holding that a zero arm’s-length price for intra-group management and support services breaches transfer-pricing rules. Taxpayers must demonstrate a tangible benefit to justify pricing. The ruling affects firms using NIL-price intra-group services under the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi rules that comparables with related party transactions exceeding 25% of sales fail the arm's length price test under Section 92C, invalidating their selection. This precedent strengthens taxpayer challenges to Transfer Pricing Officer assessments, impacting multinational enterprises and transfer pricing litigation strategies.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has struck down a Rs. 17.11 crore transfer pricing adjustment, ruling that tax authorities cannot impose a nil arm's length price for intra-group services without applying prescribed benchmarking methods or demonstrating the absence of real economic benefit. This sets a vital precedent for multinational enterprises relying on shared services, forcing tax departments to move beyond presumption and demand substantiated analysis under Section 92C.