Topic

Section 73 Evidence Act

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Specific Performance Enforced | Sham Transactions to Defeat Contract Void : High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Specific Performance Enforced | Sham Transactions to Defeat Contract Void : High Court of Madhya Pradesh

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh set aside a trial court's dismissal of a specific performance suit, ruling that a genuine agreement existed despite defendants' denial and subsequent sham sale to defeat the contract. The court emphasized that sham transactions executed within weeks of the agreement were acts of fraud, entitling the plaintiff to specific performance.

Section 13(1)(ia) HMA | Cruelty Must Be Proven by Cumulative, Corroborated Evidence; Adverse Inference Without Section 73 Notice Invalid : Delhi HC
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Section 13(1)(ia) HMA | Cruelty Must Be Proven by Cumulative, Corroborated Evidence; Adverse Inference Without Section 73 Notice Invalid : Delhi HC

Delhi High Court sets aside a divorce decree under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, ruling that allegations of cruelty must be supported by cumulative, corroborated evidence. The court held that procedural flaws, such as drawing adverse inferences without issuing a Section 73 notice under the Evidence Act, vitiate the decree. The judgment reinforces that marital cruelty must involve grave and sustained conduct, proven by credible evidence.