Topic

Section 33

5 articlesLatest September 2026
Liquidation order set aside; Sec 12A withdrawal allowed despite missing 66% vote under Sec 33 | Corporate Insolvency - IBC : NCLAT
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Liquidation order set aside; Sec 12A withdrawal allowed despite missing 66% vote under Sec 33 | Corporate Insolvency - IBC : NCLAT

NCLAT quashed the liquidation order of Jeppiaar Cements, revived the corporate insolvency resolution process and permitted withdrawal of the Sec 12A application even though the Committee of Creditors failed to meet the 66 % voting threshold prescribed by Sec 33. The ruling affirms a resolution professional’s discretion to deem a Sec 12A withdrawal viable, protecting creditor interests and keeping restructuring options open for the debtor.

Section 31 Indian Stamp Act | Collector Lacks Power to Impose Penalty or Direct Recovery; Parking Contracts Are Leases : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Section 31 Indian Stamp Act | Collector Lacks Power to Impose Penalty or Direct Recovery; Parking Contracts Are Leases : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana HC ruled that a Collector under Section 31 Indian Stamp Act can only determine duty, not impose penalties or order recovery. It also held municipal parking contracts are leases under Section 2(16)(c) as they involve letting of tolls, and functus officio does not bar impounding powers. The decision limits revenue authorities' enforcement powers and clarifies stamp duty for public parking arrangements.

Section 33 filing deadline is strict; 30-day period cannot be extended in statutory arbitrations under NH Act | Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Section 33 filing deadline is strict; 30-day period cannot be extended in statutory arbitrations under NH Act | Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court ruled that the 30-day window to move a Section 33 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is mandatory and cannot be condoned, even in statutory arbitrations under the National Highways Act. It also clarified that Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to such arbitrations. The decision tightens timelines for government-linked infrastructure disputes.

Land bought in wives’ names remains their separate property; sale deed void without consent - Section 33 ISA | SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Land bought in wives’ names remains their separate property; sale deed void without consent - Section 33 ISA | SC

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court, ruling that land registered in the names of a deceased husband’s wives is their separate property, not part of his estate. Consequently, a sale deed executed without the wives’ consent is void, limiting heirs’ claims under the Indian Succession Act. This clarifies ownership rights for widows in succession disputes.