Topic

Section 24(2) lapse

2 articlesLatest June 2026
Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act | Lapse of Acquisition Requires BOTH Non-Payment AND Non-Possession : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act | Lapse of Acquisition Requires BOTH Non-Payment AND Non-Possession : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court clarifies that land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 lapses only if compensation remains unpaid AND lawful possession is not taken. Mere treasury deposit does not suffice, and once possession is taken, land vests absolutely in the State under Section 16, barring divesting even if earlier proceedings lapse. This ruling impacts landowners and authorities in ongoing acquisition disputes.

Section 24(2) Lapse in Land Acquisition | Mandatory Reference Under Section 64 for Fair Compensation : Telangana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Telangana High Court

Section 24(2) Lapse in Land Acquisition | Mandatory Reference Under Section 64 for Fair Compensation : Telangana HC

Telangana High Court rules that lapsed land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 must be referred to a civil court under Section 64 for adjudication of compensation. The judgment reinforces natural justice principles, ensuring landowners receive fair compensation even in delayed acquisitions.