Topic

reproductive autonomy

7 articlesLatest 3 weeks ago
MTP Act Section 3(2)(b) | Marital Breakdown and Severe Mental Distress Justify Termination Up to 24 Weeks: MP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

MTP Act Section 3(2)(b) | Marital Breakdown and Severe Mental Distress Justify Termination Up to 24 Weeks: MP HC

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that the breakdown of marriage, coupled with documented psychological trauma and threat to mental well-being, qualifies as a grave risk to the woman’s health under Section 3(2)(b) of the MTP Act, extending termination rights beyond fetal anomaly cases. This affirms reproductive autonomy as a core dimension of Article 21, setting a critical precedent for women in abusive or collapsed marriages seeking legal recourse beyond the 12-week threshold.

MTP Act Section 3(2)(b) | Reproductive Autonomy of Intellectually Disabled Rape Survivor Overrides 24-Week Limit Under Article 21 : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

MTP Act Section 3(2)(b) | Reproductive Autonomy of Intellectually Disabled Rape Survivor Overrides 24-Week Limit Under Article 21 : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court held that the reproductive autonomy of a 34-year-old woman with moderate intellectual disability and autism, victimized by sexual assault, supersedes the statutory 24-week cap under the MTP Act. This ruling affirms that disability does not diminish bodily integrity under Article 21 and mandates medical boards to prioritize dignity over rigid timelines when assessing termination requests for vulnerable survivors.

Section 21(g) ART Act 2021 | Rigid Age Cap on Husband Cannot Deny IVF to Medically Eligible Wife : Chhattisgarh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Section 21(g) ART Act 2021 | Rigid Age Cap on Husband Cannot Deny IVF to Medically Eligible Wife : Chhattisgarh HC

The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that mechanically applying the husband's age limit under Section 21(g) of the ART Act 2021 to deny IVF to a medically fit wife violates her fundamental right to reproductive autonomy under Article 21. The order mandates the fertility clinic to proceed with treatment, shields it from liability, and permits continuation even if the wife reaches 50 during the process, setting a precedent for individualized medical assessment over statutory rigidity.

Section 3(2)(b) MTP Act | Bombay HC Permits Termination at 34 Weeks for Non-Lethal Skeletal Dysplasia with Severe Morbidity Risk : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 3(2)(b) MTP Act | Bombay HC Permits Termination at 34 Weeks for Non-Lethal Skeletal Dysplasia with Severe Morbidity Risk : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court ruled that the 24-week gestational limit under the MTP Act does not apply when a Medical Board confirms a 'substantial fetal abnormality' under Section 3(2)(b). The Court permitted termination at 34 weeks for non-lethal skeletal dysplasia, emphasizing the risk of severe lifelong morbidity over statutory timelines, reinforcing reproductive autonomy in exceptional medical cases.