Topic
Allahabad HC quashed a removal order against a UPMRCL employee after finding procedural violations, including denial of cross-examination and lack of evidence appreciation. The ruling reaffirms strict adherence to natural justice in departmental inquiries, impacting government employees facing disciplinary actions.
The Bombay High Court upholds the removal of a CRPF constable for chronic absenteeism and being found under the influence of liquor while on duty, affirming that such conduct constitutes gross misconduct under service law. This ruling reinforces that disciplinary authorities may impose major penalties without requiring proof of operational harm, as the breach of discipline itself undermines institutional integrity.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that removing a public servant for a single operational mistake, absent proof of gross negligence or violation of conduct rules, violates the doctrine of proportionality under Article 14. This sets a critical precedent for departmental inquiries across state services, ensuring punishment aligns with the gravity of the fault and protects long-serving employees from disproportionate penalties.
Chhattisgarh High Court rules that removal from service for an unauthorized search is disproportionate, violating principles of natural justice. The court emphasized procedural lapses and acquittal in the criminal case, mandating reconsideration of penalty for police personnel.