Topic

refund of consideration

4 articlesLatest July 2026
Consumer Protection Act | Legal Heirs & Landowners Vicariously Liable for Developer’s Refund & Compensation : WB State Commission
Case Law Analysis

Consumer Protection Act | Legal Heirs & Landowners Vicariously Liable for Developer’s Refund & Compensation : WB State Commission

West Bengal State Consumer Commission holds legal heirs of a deceased developer and the landowner jointly liable for a Rs. 17 lakh refund with 9% interest and Rs. 20,000 legal costs for non-delivery of a shop. The ruling clarifies that vicarious liability extends to successors and co-owners under the Consumer Protection Act, setting a precedent for similar housing disputes.

Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(g) | Full Refund + Interest Mandated for Builder’s Failure to Deliver Occupancy Certificate or Conveyance Deed : NCDRC
Case Law Analysis

Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(g) | Full Refund + Interest Mandated for Builder’s Failure to Deliver Occupancy Certificate or Conveyance Deed : NCDRC

Buyers are entitled to a full refund of consideration with interest when a builder fails to deliver the occupancy certificate or execute the conveyance deed within a reasonable time, as this constitutes a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act. The ruling establishes a clear precedent that possession without statutory compliance is not valid possession, protecting homebuyers from prolonged legal limbo and financial exploitation.

Section 36 Bombay Public Trusts Act | Purchasers Entitled to Refund of Proven Payments Only, Not Speculative Claims : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 36 Bombay Public Trusts Act | Purchasers Entitled to Refund of Proven Payments Only, Not Speculative Claims : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court clarifies that while charity commissioners may refuse sale sanction for procedural lapses under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, purchasers are entitled to a refund limited to proven payments made, excluding speculative or unproven claims. The ruling balances trust property protection with equitable relief for bona fide purchasers.