#Rajasthan High Court judgment

Rajasthan High Court reinforces that state governments must adhere to prescribed legal procedures in recruitment, striking down an arbitrary appointment advertisement. The court directed issuance of appointment orders within three weeks for petitioners in Baran, Sirohi, Dholpur, and Pratapgarh districts, setting a precedent for compliance with natural justice in public employment.

Rajasthan High Court rules that selected medical officers must be relieved immediately for Senior Residency Course, holding that administrative exigencies cannot override constitutional rights under Article 21. The judgment mandates compliance with CCS rules, ensuring career progression for in-service doctors without jeopardizing public health services.

Rajasthan High Court holds that failure to deposit 25% of the bid amount on the auction date under SARFAESI Act extinguishes the auction purchaser's rights, even if amended Section 13(8) applies. The ruling underscores strict compliance with deposit timelines in secured asset auctions, impacting lenders, borrowers, and bidders.

Rajasthan High Court holds that Consumer Commissions cannot dismiss complaints under Section 38(3)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 without adjudicating merits, as it violates principles of natural justice. The ruling mandates that procedural defaults cannot override substantive rights, ensuring complainants get a fair hearing.