Topic
The Delhi High Court upheld a GST search under Section 67 at an advocate's office, ruling that advocate-client privilege does not shield personal conduct from investigation. It directed safeguards for examining seized electronic data while permitting the probe to continue, affecting advocates facing tax inquiries.
Karnataka High Court reaffirms that a litigant’s right to change counsel is absolute under the Advocates Act, 1961, and does not require a No Objection Certificate from the previous advocate. The ruling underscores professional ethics and the unconditional nature of the right to legal representation, ensuring litigants are not unduly restricted in choosing their counsel.
Punjab & Haryana High Court dismisses a writ petition filed solely by Delhi-based advocates, enforcing Rule 3-A that mandates local co-counsel for non-local advocates. The court imposed ₹50,000 costs for violating procedural compliance, reinforcing strict adherence to advocate practice rules under the Advocates Act 1961.
Supreme Court holds that disciplinary proceedings under Advocates Act abate when complainant withdraws complaint and affirms satisfaction with advocate's conduct.