#possession and compensation

Karnataka High Court clarifies that land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 lapses only if compensation remains unpaid AND lawful possession is not taken. Mere treasury deposit does not suffice, and once possession is taken, land vests absolutely in the State under Section 16, barring divesting even if earlier proceedings lapse. This ruling impacts landowners and authorities in ongoing acquisition disputes.

Rajasthan High Court rules that land acquisition proceedings automatically lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid within five years of enforcement. The judgment bars voiding sale deeds without proper pleading and mandates refund of settlement deposits with interest, reinforcing landowners' rights against stalled acquisitions.