Topic

police testimony

2 articlesLatest May 2026
NDPS Act Section 21 | Chance Recovery by Patrolling Police Valid Without Mandatory Independent Witnesses : Himachal Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Himachal Pradesh High Court

NDPS Act Section 21 | Chance Recovery by Patrolling Police Valid Without Mandatory Independent Witnesses : Himachal Pradesh HC

Himachal Pradesh High Court rules that police testimony alone suffices for conviction under NDPS Act when contraband is recovered during patrolling, even without independent witnesses. The court upheld a heroin possession conviction while reducing the sentence from five to one year on proportionality grounds, clarifying that seal non-production is not fatal if specimen impressions are exhibited.

NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(B) | Police Testimony Alone Sufficient for Conscious Possession Without Independent Witness Corroboration : Chhattisgarh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(B) | Police Testimony Alone Sufficient for Conscious Possession Without Independent Witness Corroboration : Chhattisgarh HC

The Chhattisgarh High Court affirmed that in NDPS cases, the uncorroborated testimony of the investigating officer can establish conscious possession of contraband, reinforcing prosecutorial credibility in absence of eyewitnesses. This ruling strengthens the evidentiary standard for drug possession convictions while the sentence reduction to time served underscores judicial recognition of mitigating personal circumstances.