#medical termination of pregnancy

The Gauhati High Court permitted a medical termination at 27 weeks for a minor sexual assault survivor, holding that the child's best-interest supersedes the 24-week ceiling in the MTP Act. This sets a precedent that statutory gestational limits can be set aside when a minor's health and rights are at stake, affecting future POCSO and MTP cases involving minors.

Kerala High Court permitted medical termination of a 26-week pregnancy due to fetal abnormalities, citing Supreme Court precedent that upholds a woman's autonomy over her bodily integrity. The ruling reinforces reproductive rights even at advanced gestational stages when medical boards confirm severe fetal anomalies.

Kerala High Court allows medical termination of pregnancy at 29 weeks due to severe fetal abnormalities, reinforcing the right to reproductive choice under Article 21. The ruling directs hospitals to comply with the Medical Board's recommendations, setting a precedent for similar cases involving fetal health risks.

Karnataka High Court allows medical termination of a 25-week pregnancy for a minor sexual assault survivor, holding that reproductive autonomy under Article 21 overrides statutory limits when a Medical Board certifies safety. The ruling sets a precedent for victim-centric interpretations of the MTP Act, mandating compensation, counselling, and care under the Victim Compensation Scheme.

The Bombay High Court held that the reproductive autonomy of a 34-year-old woman with moderate intellectual disability and autism, victimized by sexual assault, supersedes the statutory 24-week cap under the MTP Act. This ruling affirms that disability does not diminish bodily integrity under Article 21 and mandates medical boards to prioritize dignity over rigid timelines when assessing termination requests for vulnerable survivors.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a rape survivor’s voluntary consent is decisive for medical termination of pregnancy, even beyond the 20-week limit, affirming bodily autonomy as a fundamental right under Article 21. The judgment removes procedural barriers for survivors seeking timely abortion, reinforcing that POCSO and MTP Act must be read harmoniously to protect dignity and health.

Karnataka High Court ruled that expert medical opinion from a constituted Medical Board prevails over the 24-week statutory limit under the MTP Act for termination of pregnancy in POCSO cases, where the survivor's health is at risk. The decision underscores the primacy of medical expertise in sensitive cases involving minors, setting a precedent for similar petitions.

Jharkhand High Court allows medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks for a 14-year-old rape victim, citing severe psychological trauma and Medical Board opinion. The ruling mandates state responsibility for expenses and fetal tissue preservation for DNA testing, setting a precedent for similar cases under the MTP Act.

Bombay High Court grants anticipatory bail, ruling that mere allegations of forced abortion are insufficient without proof of absence of informed consent under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The judgment shifts the evidentiary burden to the prosecution, requiring corroborative evidence beyond the complainant's statement.

Rajasthan High Court directs constitution of a medical board to assess safety of pregnancy termination for a minor rape victim and mandates DNA preservation of the fetus for seven years to aid criminal proceedings. The ruling reinforces procedural safeguards under the MTP Act while balancing victim rights and forensic evidence requirements.

MP High Court mandates constitution of a Medical Board to assess termination feasibility for minor sexual assault victims under the MTP Act, reinforcing procedural safeguards for reproductive rights. The ruling underscores the court's role in ensuring timely medical and legal intervention for vulnerable minors.

Karnataka High Court rules that termination of pregnancy beyond the 24-week statutory limit under the MTP Act requires a medical board’s assessment of foetal viability and maternal risk, overriding judicial discretion. The ruling underscores the primacy of medical expertise in late-term termination cases, while mandating victim care and rehabilitation for minor sexual assault survivors.

Bombay High Court permits termination of pregnancy at 27 weeks for a 12-year-old victim, holding that psychological health and social reputation override statutory gestational limits under the MTP Act. The ruling sets a precedent for judicial discretion in cases involving minors, emphasizing the need to prevent irreparable mental harm and family stigma.

Telangana High Court mandates constitution of a Medical Board within 24 hours to assess the feasibility of abortion for a 13-year-old POCSO victim, reinforcing victim rights under the MTP Act and constitutional guarantees. The ruling sets a precedent for expedited medical evaluations in cases involving minors and advanced pregnancies.

Bombay High Court permits termination of pregnancy for a 12-year-old rape victim at 26-27 weeks, emphasizing medical assessment over rigid gestational limits under MTP Act.