Topic

Livelihood Protection

4 articlesLatest September 2026
APMMC Rules 1966 | Indefinite Seizure of Boat Without Due Process Violates Articles 14, 19(1)(g) & 21: AP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

APMMC Rules 1966 | Indefinite Seizure of Boat Without Due Process Violates Articles 14, 19(1)(g) & 21: AP HC

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules that seizure of a boat under APMMC Rules without following prescribed procedure infringes constitutional rights to equality, livelihood, and personal liberty. The court directed release of the boat on deposit of Rs. 1.5 lakh, reinforcing that environmental regulations must comply with fundamental rights and natural justice.

SARFAESI Act | Farmer Entitled to Installment Repayment Over Land Auction Under Proportionality Principle : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

SARFAESI Act | Farmer Entitled to Installment Repayment Over Land Auction Under Proportionality Principle : Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that agricultural loan recovery cannot proceed through forced land auction when the borrower is a small farmer willing to repay in installments, affirming that livelihood protection overrides rigid asset recovery. This sets a critical precedent for banks and recovery officers to apply proportionality and humane discretion under SARFAESI proceedings, especially when the debtor’s primary asset is their means of subsistence.

Section 200(1) MV Act | Compounding Fee Mandates Release of Seized Overloaded Vehicle : Telangana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Telangana High Court

Section 200(1) MV Act | Compounding Fee Mandates Release of Seized Overloaded Vehicle : Telangana HC

Telangana High Court rules that vehicles seized for overloading offences must be released upon payment of the compounding fee under Section 200(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, irrespective of the owner’s knowledge. The judgment reinforces the statutory right to compound offences, ensuring livelihood protection for transporters and vehicle owners.