Topic

desertion

Desertion under Indian matrimonial law refers to the voluntary abandonment of a spouse without reasonable cause and without consent, as grounds for divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

9 articlesLatest June 2026
Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) Hindu Marriage Act | Cruelty & Desertion Must Be Proven with Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Allegations : Jharkhand HC
|Jharkhand High Court

Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) Hindu Marriage Act | Cruelty & Desertion Must Be Proven with Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Allegations : Jharkhand HC

Jharkhand High Court reaffirms that divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act requires strict proof of cruelty or desertion, dismissing appeals based on unsubstantiated claims. The ruling underscores the high evidentiary burden in matrimonial disputes, impacting divorce litigation strategy for Hindu couples.

Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse’s Willingness to Rejoin Overrides Prolonged Separation; Restitution Decree Upheld : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse’s Willingness to Rejoin Overrides Prolonged Separation; Restitution Decree Upheld : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that a spouse’s consistent efforts to reconcile and resume cohabitation defeat a divorce plea based on desertion, even after prolonged separation. The court emphasized the child’s welfare and the statutory mandate under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act to restore conjugal rights where willingness exists.

Section 125 CrPC | Desertion Alone Satisfies Maintenance Claim; Inability to Maintain Need Not Be Proven : MP HC Jabalpur
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 125 CrPC | Desertion Alone Satisfies Maintenance Claim; Inability to Maintain Need Not Be Proven : MP HC Jabalpur

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that once desertion by the husband is established, a wife need not prove her financial inability to maintain herself to claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. This removes an undue burden on women seeking relief and aligns the law with the statute’s protective intent, reinforcing that desertion is an independent ground for maintenance.

Section 13(1)(i-a) & (i-b) HMA | Vague Allegations of Cruelty & Desertion Insufficient for Divorce Without Cogent Evidence : Jharkhand HC
Case Law Analysis
|Jharkhand High Court

Section 13(1)(i-a) & (i-b) HMA | Vague Allegations of Cruelty & Desertion Insufficient for Divorce Without Cogent Evidence : Jharkhand HC

Jharkhand High Court reinforces that divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act requires more than mere allegations of cruelty or desertion-cogent, corroborated evidence is mandatory. The ruling sets a higher bar for matrimonial disputes, protecting spouses from frivolous divorce claims based on unsubstantiated accusations.

HMA Sections 13(1)(ia) & (ib) | Fact-Finding Courts’ Findings on Cruelty and Desertion Upheld; Enhanced Maintenance Awarded: SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

HMA Sections 13(1)(ia) & (ib) | Fact-Finding Courts’ Findings on Cruelty and Desertion Upheld; Enhanced Maintenance Awarded: SC

The Supreme Court affirmed that sustained cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, as established by fact-based findings of lower courts, justify divorce and warrant enhanced monthly maintenance to ensure the wife’s dignity and subsistence. This reinforces that judicial discretion in maintenance must reflect actual need and conduct, not just statutory minimums.

Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act | 20-Year Separation Constitutes Irretrievable Breakdown; One-Time Alimony of Rs. 50 Lakh Awarded : Jharkhand HC
Case Law Analysis
|Jharkhand High Court

Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act | 20-Year Separation Constitutes Irretrievable Breakdown; One-Time Alimony of Rs. 50 Lakh Awarded : Jharkhand HC

Jharkhand High Court rules that a 20-year separation irrevocably breaks a marriage under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, justifying divorce. The court awarded Rs. 50 lakh as one-time alimony, including Rs. 10 lakh earmarked for the daughter’s education, setting a precedent for long-term separation cases.