Topic

Customs Tribunal

3 articlesLatest August 2026
Revocation of customs broker licence and forfeiture of security deposit untenable without a valid Regulation 17 offence report | CBLR 2018 : CEST
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Revocation of customs broker licence and forfeiture of security deposit untenable without a valid Regulation 17 offence report | CBLR 2018 : CEST

The tribunal set aside the Commissioner’s order revoking PBN Logistics’ customs-broker licence and forfeiting its security deposit because no offence report under Regulation 17 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018 was produced. The ruling mandates that any licence cancellation must be supported by a duly recorded offence report, safeguarding brokers from arbitrary action.

Section 46 Customs Act 1962 | Late Fees Waived for Bona Fide Excess Cargo Discovered Post-Clearance Where Importer Not at Fault : CESTAT Kolkata
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Section 46 Customs Act 1962 | Late Fees Waived for Bona Fide Excess Cargo Discovered Post-Clearance Where Importer Not at Fault : CESTAT Kolkata

CESTAT Kolkata has ruled that importers cannot be penalized with late fees under Section 46 when excess cargo is identified only after customs clearance and the delay stems from logistical or inspection realities beyond their control. This sets a critical precedent for traders facing unforeseen discrepancies in cargo declarations, reinforcing that administrative penalties must align with fault-based liability under the Customs Act.