Topic

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Law

3 articlesLatest June 2026
Customs Exemption Notification No. 65/88-Cus. | Hospital Duty Waiver Voided for Failing Free Treatment Obligations : CESTAT Hyderabad
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Customs Exemption Notification No. 65/88-Cus. | Hospital Duty Waiver Voided for Failing Free Treatment Obligations : CESTAT Hyderabad

CESTAT Hyderabad denied customs duty exemption to Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital for failing to fulfill mandatory conditions: providing free treatment to 40% of outpatients and reserving 10% of beds for low-income patients. The ruling reinforces that exemption benefits are strictly conditional, and non-compliance triggers retrospective duty demand and confiscation - a critical warning for charitable hospitals relying on duty waivers.

Clause 1C, Notification 04/2006-CE | Packaging with RSP Does Not Invalidate CVD Exemption for Industrial-Use Cement : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Clause 1C, Notification 04/2006-CE | Packaging with RSP Does Not Invalidate CVD Exemption for Industrial-Use Cement : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that imported cement in 50kg bags bearing MRP is eligible for concessional CVD exemption under Clause 1C if demonstrably intended for industrial or institutional use, not retail sale. The decision clarifies that packaging alone cannot override documented end-use, shielding bulk industrial buyers from arbitrary duty demands based on form rather than function.

Section 112(a) Customs Act | Consistent Past Classification Acceptance Bars Extended Period Duty Demand: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Section 112(a) Customs Act | Consistent Past Classification Acceptance Bars Extended Period Duty Demand: CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that when customs authorities have consistently accepted a tariff classification over years, the department cannot later allege suppression to extend the limitation period for duty demand. This protects importers and logistics firms from retrospective penalties when classifications were openly and repeatedly approved, reinforcing legal certainty in trade compliance.