Topic

Customs and Excise

3 articlesLatest June 2026
Rule 6 CCR 2004 | Bagasse as Agricultural Waste Not an Exempted Good; Cenvat Credit Reversal Not Warranted : CESTAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rule 6 CCR 2004 | Bagasse as Agricultural Waste Not an Exempted Good; Cenvat Credit Reversal Not Warranted : CESTAT Ahmedabad

CESTAT Ahmedabad holds that bagasse, generated as agricultural waste during sugar production, cannot be classified as an exempted good under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, rendering circulars demanding credit reversal unlawful. This clarifies that waste by-products not intentionally manufactured for sale do not trigger input credit reversal obligations, benefiting sugar mills and agro-industries nationwide.

SSI Exemption | Independent Units Cannot Be Clubbed for Clearance Valuation Without Separate SCN: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

SSI Exemption | Independent Units Cannot Be Clubbed for Clearance Valuation Without Separate SCN: CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai ruled that tax authorities cannot aggregate clearances from legally independent units to deny SSI exemption unless each unit receives a separate show cause notice. This upholds natural justice and prevents arbitrary aggregation, protecting small manufacturers from collective liability without individual due process.

Section 2(f) Central Excise Act | Crushing Waste PET Bottles into Flakes Not 'Manufacture' : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Section 2(f) Central Excise Act | Crushing Waste PET Bottles into Flakes Not 'Manufacture' : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that sorting, crushing, and washing waste PET bottles into flakes does not qualify as 'manufacture' under the Central Excise Act, exempting such recycling units from excise duty. The ruling clarifies the legal threshold for 'manufacture' in waste processing, impacting PET recycling businesses and excise compliance.