Topic

constitutional employer

3 articlesLatest May 2026
Article 14 & Equal Pay for Equal Work | 35 Years of Continuous Casual Service Triggers Regularization Duty: Rajasthan HC Rejects Mechanical Uma Devi Application
Case Law Analysis
|Rajasthan High Court

Article 14 & Equal Pay for Equal Work | 35 Years of Continuous Casual Service Triggers Regularization Duty: Rajasthan HC Rejects Mechanical Uma Devi Application

Rajasthan High Court holds that an employee serving over 35 years as a casual sweeper is entitled to regularization and consequential benefits, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The ruling mandates consideration of long-term service under Article 14, even where initial appointment was irregular, setting a precedent for similarly situated casual workers.

Outsourcing as Constitutional Evasion | Long-Term Contractual Workers Performing Regular Duties Entitled to Regularization : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Outsourcing as Constitutional Evasion | Long-Term Contractual Workers Performing Regular Duties Entitled to Regularization : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that public employers cannot circumvent constitutional obligations by retaining workers for over a decade under outsourcing arrangements while performing core, perennial duties. This decision mandates regularization with full benefits, closing a loophole used to deny job security, pay scales, and social protections to workers who function as de facto permanent staff.