Topic

clerical error

A clerical error in Indian law refers to minor administrative or typographical mistakes in court orders, records, or documents that do not reflect the true intent of the decision.

7 articlesLatest May 2026
CPC Sections 151 & 153 | Typographical Errors in Compromise Applications Under Order XXIII Rule 3 May Be Corrected to Uphold Substantive Justice : MP HC Gwalior
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

CPC Sections 151 & 153 | Typographical Errors in Compromise Applications Under Order XXIII Rule 3 May Be Corrected to Uphold Substantive Justice : MP HC Gwalior

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has affirmed that clerical mistakes in compromise applications - such as misidentifying parties in survey number allocations - can be rectified under the court’s inherent powers under Sections 151 and 153 CPC, even after decree issuance. This ruling empowers litigants to correct inadvertent drafting errors without reopening substantive agreements, reinforcing that procedural technicalities must not defeat the ends of justice in civil compromises.

Administrative Errors Cannot Deny LLB Degree to Bona Fide Student | HP HC Directs Degree Issuance Despite Clerical Mismatch in University Records
Case Law Analysis
|Himachal Pradesh High Court

Administrative Errors Cannot Deny LLB Degree to Bona Fide Student | HP HC Directs Degree Issuance Despite Clerical Mismatch in University Records

The Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that a student who completed an LLB course and cleared all examinations cannot be denied a degree due to clerical errors in university records. The court directed the university to issue the degree within four weeks of a mark correction application, emphasizing that bona fide students should not suffer for administrative lapses.

Functus Officio Doctrine | Post-Finalization Insertion of Interest in Recovery Certificate Not Permissible as Clerical Correction : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Functus Officio Doctrine | Post-Finalization Insertion of Interest in Recovery Certificate Not Permissible as Clerical Correction : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that once a recovery certificate is issued, the authority becomes functus officio and cannot later insert interest without a fresh adjudication, even if the interest was mathematically calculable. This reinforces that clerical corrections cannot substantively alter liability, protecting borrowers from unilateral administrative expansion of debt beyond the original order.