Topic

Acquiescence

6 articlesLatest September 2026
Compassionate appointment staff can shift to Old Pension Scheme despite post-2004 NPS entry if recruitment began before OPS; laches not a bar | Delhi Police OPS shift : CAT
|Central Administrative Tribunal

Compassionate appointment staff can shift to Old Pension Scheme despite post-2004 NPS entry if recruitment began before OPS; laches not a bar | Delhi Police OPS shift : CAT

The CAT ruled that Delhi Police constables appointed on compassionate grounds may be transferred from the New Pension Scheme to the Old Pension Scheme when the recruitment process started before the OPS cut-off date, even if they joined after 1 January 2004. The tribunal held that laches and lack of prior notice do not defeat the entitlement. This benefits all compassionate-appointment employees seeking OPS benefits.

Section 34 Trade Marks Act | Prior Adoption & Registration in India Prevail Over Trans-Border Reputation : Bombay HC Denies Interim Relief in Co-Existence Dispute
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 34 Trade Marks Act | Prior Adoption & Registration in India Prevail Over Trans-Border Reputation : Bombay HC Denies Interim Relief in Co-Existence Dispute

Bombay High Court rules that prior adoption and registration of a trademark in India override claims of trans-border reputation, even for globally recognized brands. The Court denied interim relief to both parties, permitting co-existence of identical marks due to acquiescence and failure to establish goodwill in India, setting a precedent for domestic trademark disputes involving foreign entities.

Laches & Acquiescence Bar Belated Challenge to Vakalatnama Authenticity : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Laches & Acquiescence Bar Belated Challenge to Vakalatnama Authenticity : Punjab & Haryana HC

Punjab & Haryana High Court dismisses a revision petition challenging a Vakalatnama filed four years prior, ruling that delayed claims of forgery at the final trial stage constitute abuse of process. The court held that valid service of summons and prolonged silence without protest bar relief under principles of acquiescence and laches, reinforcing procedural finality in litigation.

Trademarks Act Section 34 | Prior Use Trumps Registration Despite Delayed Action: Delhi HC Denies Injunction to 'KENT' Water Purifier Giant Against Cable Manufacturer
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Trademarks Act Section 34 | Prior Use Trumps Registration Despite Delayed Action: Delhi HC Denies Injunction to 'KENT' Water Purifier Giant Against Cable Manufacturer

The Delhi High Court ruled that continuous prior use of a trademark since 2009 overrides later registration, even if the registered owner has substantial goodwill. Acquiescence and a decade-long failure to act barred the water purifier company from obtaining an interim injunction against the cable manufacturer, reinforcing that trademark rights are earned through actual use, not just registration.