
The Supreme Court has held that a Division Bench exercising writ appellate jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot issue directions that circumscribe an Arbitral Tribunal's authority under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to rule on its own jurisdiction, including the arbitrability of disputes classified as "excepted matters" under a works contract. The Court clarified that the question whether a claim falls within an excepted-matters clause is a matter of kompetenz-kompetenz committed to the Tribunal in the first instance, and a writ court - whose engagement with merits was declined on grounds of complicated factual questions - lacks the jurisdiction to prescribe the manner of adjudication.






