
Section 16(1)(m) Maharashtra Rent Control Act | Non-Use of Shop for 3 Years + Photographic Evidence Justifies Eviction Even Without Tenant’s Defense : Bombay HC
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant who left a commercial shop unused for over three years, accepting landlord-submitted photographs as conclusive proof of non-use. The ruling reinforces that tenant silence and failure to contest evidence in ex-parte proceedings do not shield against eviction under Section 16(1)(m), setting a clear precedent for landlords seeking recovery of abandoned commercial premises.
