Topic

tenant default

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 16(1)(m) Maharashtra Rent Control Act | Non-Use of Shop for 3 Years + Photographic Evidence Justifies Eviction Even Without Tenant’s Defense : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 16(1)(m) Maharashtra Rent Control Act | Non-Use of Shop for 3 Years + Photographic Evidence Justifies Eviction Even Without Tenant’s Defense : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant who left a commercial shop unused for over three years, accepting landlord-submitted photographs as conclusive proof of non-use. The ruling reinforces that tenant silence and failure to contest evidence in ex-parte proceedings do not shield against eviction under Section 16(1)(m), setting a clear precedent for landlords seeking recovery of abandoned commercial premises.

Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act | Security Deposit Cannot Offset Rent Arrears Without Explicit Agreement : Gauhati HC
Case Law Analysis
|Gauhati High Court

Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act | Security Deposit Cannot Offset Rent Arrears Without Explicit Agreement : Gauhati HC

Gauhati High Court rules that landlords cannot unilaterally adjust a tenant's security deposit against rent arrears under the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act unless the tenancy agreement expressly permits such adjustment. The ruling reinforces tenants' strict liability for rent payment and bars automatic set-off, impacting landlord-tenant disputes in Assam.