Topic

supplementary demand

2 articlesLatest August 2026
Sec 56(2) Elec Act 2003 - Supplementary demand after short-billing not barred by limitation | Short-billing : HC Punjab & Haryana
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Sec 56(2) Elec Act 2003 - Supplementary demand after short-billing not barred by limitation | Short-billing : HC Punjab & Haryana

By holding that the limitation clock starts when the original electricity bill is issued, the Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that a later supplementary demand arising from short-billing remains enforceable despite the two-year bar in Sec 56(2). This protects utilities from indefinite liability and informs consumers that corrected arrears can be billed even years after the initial invoice.

Section 56(2) Electricity Act, 2003 | Disconnection Barred for Surcharge Claims Older Than Two Years Without Continuous Billing : Gauhati HC
Case Law Analysis
|Gauhati High Court

Section 56(2) Electricity Act, 2003 | Disconnection Barred for Surcharge Claims Older Than Two Years Without Continuous Billing : Gauhati HC

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that electricity distributors cannot disconnect power for surcharge claims dating back more than two years if those charges were never reflected in regular bills. This protects consumers from retroactive demands based on outdated audits, reinforcing that limitation periods under the Electricity Act require active, transparent billing - not silent accumulation of dues.