Topic

Share Transfer

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Order XXXIX CPC | Consent Orders Must Reflect Parties' Agreement in Joint Demat Account Disputes: Gauhati HC
Case Law Analysis
|Gauhati High Court

Order XXXIX CPC | Consent Orders Must Reflect Parties' Agreement in Joint Demat Account Disputes: Gauhati HC

Gauhati High Court sets aside a trial court order dismissing an injunction application despite respondent's consent, ruling that consent orders under Order XXXIX CPC must accurately reflect the parties' agreement. The judgment restrains the transfer of 861,918 shares in a joint demat account, reinforcing that courts cannot alter agreed terms unless they violate statutory provisions.

Order VII Rule 10 CPC | Jurisdiction for Share Transfer Suits Lies Where Contract Executed and Shares Situated: Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Order VII Rule 10 CPC | Jurisdiction for Share Transfer Suits Lies Where Contract Executed and Shares Situated: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that commercial courts have jurisdiction over share transfer disputes if the contract was executed and the shares are situated at the company’s registered office. The decision clarifies that plaintiffs cannot be compelled to file suits in distant courts merely based on defendant’s residence, reinforcing jurisdictional convenience for commercial litigants.