Topic

Section 68 Evidence Act

6 articlesLatest September 2026
Indian Stamp Act | Insufficiently Stamped Agreement for Sale Requires Impoundment, Not Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit : Calcutta HC
Case Law Analysis
|Calcutta High Court

Indian Stamp Act | Insufficiently Stamped Agreement for Sale Requires Impoundment, Not Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court ruled that an insufficiently stamped agreement for sale in a specific performance suit must be impounded under the Indian Stamp Act rather than leading to dismissal of the suit. The court remanded the matter for payment of deficit stamp duty and adjudication on merits, clarifying that stamp deficiency is a curable procedural defect, not a substantive bar to relief.

Section 68 Evidence Act | Minor Layperson Errors & Unchallenged Witness Testimony Suffice to Discharge Burden of Proof in Probate : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 68 Evidence Act | Minor Layperson Errors & Unchallenged Witness Testimony Suffice to Discharge Burden of Proof in Probate : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court held that procedural irregularities in a will’s execution - such as inconsistent dates or locations - do not invalidate probate if attesting witnesses unchallenged by the opponent affirm its authenticity. This clarifies that technical flaws by non-lawyers are not fatal under Section 68, empowering executors and beneficiaries facing familial challenges to probate without requiring perfect documentation.

Section 63 Succession Act | 'Suspicious Circumstances' in Will Validity Require Concrete Evidence of Fraud or Incapacity : Madras HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court

Section 63 Succession Act | 'Suspicious Circumstances' in Will Validity Require Concrete Evidence of Fraud or Incapacity : Madras HC

Madras High Court rules that mere hospitalization, evening registration, or unequal bequests do not invalidate a Will unless supported by concrete evidence of fraud, undue influence, or testamentary incapacity. The judgment reinforces testamentary autonomy where the Will is duly executed and registered, shifting the burden of proof to challengers to establish material irregularities.