Case Law Analysis
|Uttarakhand High Court
Alternative Remedy Doctrine | Disputed Factual Issues in Land Acquisition Compensation Bar Writ Jurisdiction : Uttarakhand HC
Uttarakhand High Court rules that writ petitions under Article 226 are inadmissible for land acquisition compensation disputes involving contested facts, mandating statutory remedy under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. The decision reinforces the Alternative Remedy Doctrine, impacting landowners challenging compensation awards.