#Section 164

The Delhi High Court ruled that a Section 164 statement remains valid even if a parent assists as interpreter, and that PoCSO’s interpreter requirement is fulfilled by any person competent in the child’s mode of communication. This expands admissibility of child-witness testimony and clarifies interpreter qualifications for future PoCSO sexual-offence cases, affecting prosecutors and defence counsel.

Madras High Court rules that once public notice under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is issued, private landowners cannot halt national transmission projects by raising objections afterward. The District Collector’s role is limited to determining compensation, not vetoing project execution.

Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that enhanced compensation under Section 164 MV Act applies only prospectively; accidents prior to 2022 amendment not entitled to revised rates.